Menu

Sunday, 23 July 2017

135) RADICAL THEOLOGY - RAV TZADOK HAKOHEN'S OUT OF THE BOX THINKING:

Burial site of Rav Tzadok HaKohen and R. Leibel Eiger.
INTRODUCTION:

About twenty-five years ago I was sitting and talking to R. Shlomo Carlebach - who for a so many from my generation had been a towering and influential figure – when I asked him: “R. Shlomo, what do I have to do to become a chassid of yours?”

He looked at me and his eyes smiled as he responded: “But I want to be a chassid of you!”
I said: “Okay, but in the meantime tell me what I have to do.”
He said: “Read all the books of R. Tzadok haKohen, particularly Resisei Leiyla.”

I was desperate to get hold of this book but I had difficulty in finding a copy. Months passed and I was disappointed that I had not read Resisei Laiyla.

Then, out of the blue, a mother of a congregant of mine arrived back from holidaying in the United States.  She called me and said she had a book for me from ‘some or other rabbi’ she had bumped into whilst in New York. It was a well worn blue hard covered book entitled Resisei Leiyla. R. Shlomo had given me his own personal copy of this book, which is today one of my prized possessions.

What was it about R. Tzadok haKohen that R. Shlomo knew would resonate with me?
This article is an attempt at trying to discover that answer.

RADICAL THEOLOGY IN THE WESTERN WORLD:

We begin with a look at a modern movement which caught the imagination of the non-Jewish[1] world and which also began to attract attention from the Jewish religious word:

In the 1960’s a movement began amongst the avant-garde which became known as Radical Theology. It prompted religious people generally to take a new and challenging look at their religion whilst still remaining technically within the broad folds of their theology.

The followers of this new movement bandied about slogans like the ‘Death of G-d’ which they explained to mean that the old and narrow definitions of G-d had to make way for a far broader understanding of the G-d concept. And far broader it certainly was because Radical Theology could even encompass aspects of classical atheism!

Professor Thomas Altizer[2] gives a number of possible explanations as to what the term ‘Death of G-d’ could mean for modern Western culture:

“...That our traditional liturgical and theological language needs a thorough overhaul; the reality (of G-d[3]) abides, but classical modes of thought and form of language may well have had it...That the Christian story is no longer a saving or healing story. It may manage to stay on as merely illuminating or guiding, but it no longer performs its classical functions of salvation or redemption...that our language about G-d is always inadequate and imperfect...(Religion) has learned...the necessity for theology to engage in a living dialogue with the actual world and history which theology confronts...

For anyone who has ever studied mysticism, these concepts – such as the inability to describe G-d – are not that foreign at all.

RADICAL THEOLOGY IN THE JEWISH WORLD:

A similar form of Radical Theology also started (and it could be argued already existed) within the Jewish and Torah world.

I found it interesting that in his book on the Sefat Emet, Professor Arthur Green writes that he had studied privately with R. Abraham Joshua Heschel, and in 1966 he asked his teacher what he thought about Radical Theology.

R. Heschel answered: “Radical theology is very important. And it must begin with the Sfas Emes and R. Tzadok ha-Kohen of Lublin.”
In this way, R. Heschel characterised Rav Tzadok haKohen as a proponent of a Jewish form of Radical Theology.

In keeping with the dictum ‘as in the non-Jewish world so in the Jewish world’, Professor Green explains that the writings of Rav Tzadok haKohen: “... have enjoyed a recent upsurge of popularity, especially in Israel, where they are currently being reprinted in various augmented and well-indexed editions.” So these books are today finding some appeal for those looking for an unrestrained view on G-d and religion.

Perhaps one can add to the list and include more rabbis who could be said to have written in the style of Radical Theology:

RAV KOOK:

Rav Kook had already written that atheism had a role to play to ‘cleanse’ some of the religious who espoused very narrow definitions of what in fact is an infinite and universal G-d. The atheist could therefore rightly deny a narrow and parochial interpretation of G-d and thus inadvertently contribute something of great value to theology. See KOTZK BLOG 114.

KOTZK:

In a similar fashion, the Kotzker Rebbe brilliantly remarked: “I too do not believe in the same G-d that an atheist doesn’t believe in.” This view again, adds something to the expansiveness of the G-d concept.

In this sense, the common and limited definition of G-d was indeed ‘dead’. And the way was opened for a truer, bigger and more infinite, universal and unknowable G-d. This was something that Kabbalah in general and Chassidut, in particular, had already been addressing for a long time.

Another statement of the Kotzker, which speaks to the notion of Radical Theology more than anything else I know, is: “Other Chassidim believe that man’s soul is reincarnated into this world in order to affect a tikkun (I.e. to repair some misconduct from a past life) – But in Kotzk we believe that man is put onto this world in order to affect a tikkun in G-d Himself!

What this may mean is that he was so uneasy with the way the masses had conclusively defined and limited the G-d concept to fit their own inadequate notions of infinity, that he needed to teach a way of ‘rectifying’ their perceptions of G-d.

But let’s see how Rav Tzadok haKohen relates to Radical Theology:

WHO WAS RAV TZADOK HAKOHEN?

R. Tzadok haKohen Rabinowitz of Lublin (1823-1900) was born to a Lithuanian rabbinic family that was related to the Vilna Gaon and traced its roots back to the Maharal of Prague. He left the Lithuanian way and joined R. Mordechai Yosef Leiner (known as the Izbica Rebbe). 

He later took over the reins of from R. Yehuda Leib Eiger (a grandson of the famed R. Akiva Eiger and also a student of the Izbica) and in 1888 he assumed a leadership role in the Izbica movement. For some reason, during his lifetime he did not manage to attract a significant following, something which ironically did occur after his passing.

It was during the so called ‘silent years’ of R. Leibelle Eiger’s leadership, which amounted to about thirty-four years during which he spent in seclusion, that Rav Tzadok devoted himself to writing.
One of his apparently only surviving students – the rest all perished during the Holocaust - R. Mokotovsky, was the father of R. Eliyahu Mokotovsky also known as Eliyahu Kitov[4].

Besides his prolific writing on Halacha, Kabbalah and ethics, he also wrote on astronomy, geometry and algebra, something rather unusual for a Chassidic Rebbe. He was particularly interested in History. None of his writings were published during his lifetime.

[It should be mentioned that according to Alan Brill[5] some editors were hasty to add that Rav Tzadok later regretted his forays into secular wisdom. Brill views this extrapolation with a degree of scepticism and considers it to be unsubstantiated. Furthermore, he cites Bromberg who records Rav Tzadok continuing his secular studies well into his later years.]

He married young, into a wealthy family, but divorced quickly after allegations concerning the impropriety of his wife began to surface. His wife refused to accept the divorce so Rav Tzadok was forced to travel in order to get signatures of one hundred rabbis to annul his marriage. It was during these travels that he met the Izbica Rebbe. He did marry again but did not have any children. His childlessness affected him deeply and some of his books (Pri - offspring- Tzadik and Poked Akkarim - barren) allude to his pain of not having children.

HIS PHILOSOPHY:

In recent times, the academic world has started paying attention to Rav Tzadok’s writings which have attracted historians, theologians and sociologists, who refer to him as ‘The Kohen’.[6]
Rav Tzadok had an amazing ability to synchronise two very distinct area of classical rabbinical thought, namely Halacha (legal study) and Aggadita (non-legal study).

His thoughts influenced many leaders like R. Eliyahu Dessler and R. Yitzchak Hutner. According to Dovid Bashevkin: “...the resurgence of the study of what has come to be known as ‘mahshava’ in contemporary yeshivot truly owes a great deal of credit to the works of Reb Tzadok.”

Bashevkin explains that Rav Tzadok differed from the mainstream orthodox approach which follows the Zohar, where the Torah is the exclusive representation of G-d’s will; “G-d looked into the Torah and created the world.”[7] The universe is therefore not afforded any G-dly status as that is the sole domain of the Torah which created it.

However, in Rav Tzadok’s system which he learned from the Izbica, there are actually two ‘Books’: G-d created one book called the World! The commentary on that book is called the Torah!

Thus, in a sense, the Universe is higher than the Torah: “This...places a greater focus on the world as a repository for G-dly revelation...” writes Bashevkin, who goes on ask: “...does this analogy leave room for the possibility that the World may contain truths that do not even exist within the Torah?[8] 

Bashevkin quotes Galileo who in 1623, wrote a fascinating description of a ‘Grand Book of the Universe’:

Philosophy is written in this Grand Book, the Universe, which stands continually open to our gaze. But the Book cannot be understood unless one first learns to comprehend the language and read the letters in which it is composed. It is written in the language of mathematics, and its characters are triangles, circles and other geometric figures without which it is humanly impossible to understand a single word of it...”[9]

Perhaps this is one of the reasons why so many of our classical sages were all masters of astronomy, geometry and such sciences. And perhaps this is also why some rebbes encouraged their students to spend time in the natural world.

Here is Rav Tzadok’s full text which deals with his understanding of this ‘Book of the Universe’:

And it is for this reason that after the blessing ‘Yotzer ha-Meorot,’ which relates to the recognition of the recreation of the world every day, [the Rabbis] established a second blessing which functions as a blessing on the Torah as explained in Berachot 11b (i.e. ‘Ahava Rabba’). One requests (to God) to know the innovations of the Torah which are through the recreation of the world. And as I have heard, that God created a book, and that is the world (Olam), and the commentary (on the book), and that is that Torah. For the Torah is akin to a commentary of God’s possessions.”[10]

Thus, according to Rav Tzadok the first blessing recognises the creation of the Universe. The second blessing requests to know the unique Torah contained within that Universe. This Torah is higher than the Book of the Torah which is the commentary to the Torah of the Universe.

Rav Tzadok continues: “And so I have received that this entire world is a book which G-d created. And it appears to me that as a child I saw such a formulation in the work Meor Einayim[11], which cited the formulation in a gentile work of pedagogy.”[12]

So we see that according to Rav Tzadok the experiential world becomes a means of revelation of the highest order and the Torah is the ‘commentary’ to it.
Now that’s Radical Theology.

R. Haym Soloveitchick wrote about Sefer Chassidim (a text by R. Yehudah ben Shmuel of Regensburg [1150-1217] which discusses the life and times of the Chassidei Ashkenaz or the pious rabbis of Germany during that period). He points out that this notion of ‘Book of Universe’ was prevalent even in the medieval world of Chassidei Ashkenaz as expressed in Sefer Chassidim.

R. Soloveitchick writes: “underlying much of Sefer Hasidim, is the will of G-d...(which) has not been confined within the overt dictates of the Torah, written or oral.”[13] In other words there is a ‘will of G-d’ to be found within the Universe in addition to within the Book of the Torah.

Thus Sefer Chassidim could serve as a possible precedent for the Izbica’s and Rav Tzadok’s bold philosophy.[14]

[It is interesting to note that the notion of multiple 'Books' in addition to the Torah is not uncommon in mystical thinking. The Sefer Yetzirah, for example, begins by stating:

"He created His universe with three books (sefarim) - with text (sefer), with number (sefar) and with communication (sippur)."]

RAV TZADOK’S DEFINITION OF GOOD:

Bashevkin shares a passage from Rav Tzadok which offers an interesting interpretation of the definition of good:

 “For example when G-d wishes good it is manifest(ed) personally in each of his creations according to their conception of good. The Jewish people relate according to their conception of good, gentiles relate each according to their own conception…and so it is with all creations according to their own conception. And therefore it is nearly impossible to define what is the implicit will that God intends to impart since it is manifest(ed) through different being(s), each with their own conceptions and notions of that message.”[15]

RAV TZADOK’S UNDERSTANDING OF HISTORICAL INFLUENCES:

According to Professor Yaakov Elman:

In Tsadok ha-Kohen’s view, the development of Torah paralleled that of secular wisdom—gentile or, in this case, Greek wisdom—the two unfolding apace and in parallel, in accordance with the principle of Ecclesiastes 7:14, “One opposite the other did the Lord make.” Thus, just as Babylonian magic and sorcery gave way to Greek philosophy, so did prophecy give way to Talmudic reasoning and logic—and in both cases, the later stage was superior to the earlier one.”

RAV TZADOK REJECTS THE TRADITIONAL CHASSIDIC MODEL:

Alan Brill writes[16] that Rav Tzadok rejected the traditional Chassidic model of simple piety. He departed from his other Chassidim in that he didn’t believe it was enough to simply direct the emotions and thought toward heaven because no mystical experience could take place without knowledge. This was quite a departure from the teachings of many of the other Rebbes.

Rav Tzadok even quoted from Ramabm’s Guide of the Perplexed:

It is impossible to reach the level of continual cleaving (to G-d) except through wisdom and comprehension of the mysteries of out holy Torah. As is written in the Guide of the Perplexed concerning those who think of G-d and continuously remember Him: If it is done without knowledge, through imagination (dimayon) alone or through the traditional faith that G-d is near, withot remembering G-d in truth, you are not thinking of Him.”

ANALYSIS:

Rav Tzadok haKohen was no typical Chassidic Rebbe.  His views on many crucial subjects are somewhat out of the box, or more accurately ‘out of the book’. He was one of the few who was able to successfully blend mysticism with rationalism and tradition with history.

The masses will probably always follow whatever format of religious philosophy their leaders present to them. However, those who allow their minds to explore the depths of theology would do well to revisit the writings of Rav Tzadok haKohen, who seemes to be communicating not so much with his generation but with ours.






[1] Particularly the Protestants.
[2] See Radical Theology and the Death of G-d by Thomas Altizer and William Hamilton.
[3] Parenthesis mine.
[4] Author of the well known Sefer haToda’ah.

[5] See Thinking God: The Mysticism of Rabbi Zadok of Lublin, by Alan Brill, p.43.

[6] See Perpetual Prophecy: An Intellectual Tribute to Reb Tzadok ha-Kohen of Lublin on his 110th Yartzeit, By Dovid Bashevkin. I have drawn widely from this article.
[7] Zohar: vol. 2, 161a.
[8] See Perpetual Prophecy ibid.
[9] Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo (New York: Doubleday, 1957), 238.
[10] Taken from Perpetual Prophecy ibid.
[11] Which was written by Azariah de Rossi (1513-1578).
[12] Mahashvot Harutz, 11. Bashevkin points out that it is amazing that Rav Tzadok cited Meor Einayim (which was already considered a controversial work) and that he did not omit the reference to the Gentile source! 
[13] See R. Haym Soloveitchik, “Three Themes in Sefer Hasidim,” 313.
[14] It now appears that there may be three sources for Rav Tzadok’s radical view on the Book of the World: 1) The Izbica, from whom he heard concept from. 2) Sefer Chassidim, and 3) Meor Einayim.
[15] Dover Tzedek, 111.
The full text reads: “And our Rabbis have revealed to us stories which discuss the bat kol, which is defined as listening to the voices of everyday people who are discussing daily matters and do have other intentions. Rather one listener is able to be informed, through their words, what is required of him… Namely, God articulates the will of his voice through regular people. Even though they have their own intentions when they speak and the directives do not seem to emanate from God with intention and clarity, rather His will relates to us implicitly…”
[16] Ibid. p.55.

Sunday, 16 July 2017

134) LETTERS FROM THE BAAL SHEM TOV IN ENGLISH FOR THE FIRST TIME:

LETTERS FROM THE CHERSON GENIZA – TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH.  PART 5.



INTRODUCTION:

What follows is an English translation of some of the letters which were found in the Cherson Geniza in southern Ukraine around 1917. They are alleged to be copies of letters written by the Baal Shem Tov and his students dating back to the mid-1700’s.

Through this collection of what may be called the ‘Cairo Geniza’ of Chassidism, we are afforded an unprecedented window into the early Chassidic movement - its characters, its hopes, fears and aspirations. We see a very human component to what is usually characterised purely as an otherworldly and mystical society.

I am not aware of any other translations of these letters, and my intention here is solely to present their content in English, for those who are interested in a behind the scenes look at early Chasidism.

I have tried to present each of the individual translations of the documents as accurately as I can - but the footnotes are my personal interpretation (and sometimes speculation) regarding the events, based on research into the personalities and history of that time.

Many, outside of Chabad and Rudzhin believe these letters to be forgeries. They may be. But I have found them to be so incredibly intriguing that I hope they are not.

For an analysis of the fascinating history and controversy surrounding these letters, see KOTZK BLOG 123.

The translations which follow are my own and I take full responsibility for any inaccuracies.


[The following four letters document the correspondence between the Baal Shem Tov and his reluctant (at that stage) future student/successor, R. Dov Ber (or Maggid) of Mezeritch. This correspondence took place during the year 5512 (1752), a mere twelve years before the Ball Shem Tov’s passing in 1760.]
...................................................................................................................................................................

DOCUMENT 100:

Letter from the Baal Shem Tov to R. Dovber of Mezeritch, stating that he senses that R. Dovber is reluctant to meet with him. The Baal Shem Tov, nevertheless, asks him to consider meeting and even debating with him, as he has great plans for the two of them to disseminate the new Chassidic teachings:


B”H
Monday (Parshat Korach) 5512 (1752). Medzebuzh.

The honourable genius, holy and famous rabbi, with a good name, who is proficient at both the revealed and hidden (traditions), the G-dly Kabbalist etc, etc, our teacher the rabbi, Rabbi Dovber, may you live forever:

The men who came to (inform) me, transmitted verbally to me that (you) holy and honourable one y’n, had already made up your holy mind to come to me and study under my tutorage[1], (and remain) under the shade of the fear of G-d, that the pleasantness of G-d should be upon you.[2]

However, since I see that that you, honourable one y’n[3], are still doubtful (about coming to study with me and) carrying out that objective - for this reason, I present you with these sentences (and urge you) not to listen to the untrue and false words (spoken against me), which the reckless have submitted to you, for their foundation is baseless. I am not like this (as they have suggested).

As for me, all I want is to do good to (my) fellow man and not, Heaven forefend, to bring them down.  
Please determine just once to come and debate with me, and if I am not (deemed) favourable in your eyes, honourable one y’n, then the choice is yours (to leave).

But Heaven is my whiteness that (should you choose to come to me) your spirit will (be enhanced) twofold, and you will be satiated by the illumination of your soul, and I will be your support.
Know, honourable one y’n, that this is the first letter I have written to another in this regard. But I know that (you) the holy one are the chosen of G-d to disseminate my teachings, (and) the Torah of G-d is pure.

Therefore, turn from your intransigence and (acceptance of) gossip and come to me. It will (then) be good for us and all of Israel, for two are better than one. By this, I mean that (we are better) if we are incorporated in the oneness (of G-d).

And (on that note) I will end with the oneness (of) Hashem, G-d of Israel.[4]
From, the beloved of your soul, from far and near;

I (eagerly) await to hear (of your pending visit) and to see you within the precincts of my home;
Yisrael, son of our teacher the rabbi, Rabbi Eliezer Baal Shem.
Medzebuzh.

(P.S.) I am sending this letter to you, honourable one y’n, by means of my Torah (observant) student, the holy man, Mr Nachman yc’n[5] of Horodenka yz’v[6].

..................................................................................................................................................................

DOCUMENT 99:

The response of R. Dovber of Mezeritch to the previous letter, informing him that he has reconsidered, and intends to meet with the Baal Shem Tov:


B”H
Sunday (Parshat) Balak 5512 (1752). Lukotsh.

To the honourable and holy one, the holy and famous rabbi, who is most elevated, our teacher and rabbi, the rabbi of all of the children of the exile etc, our teacher the rabbi, Rabbi Yisrael n’y Baal Shem Tov, in the holy community of Medzebuzh:
I received your letter from Monday (Parshat) Korach.

In a few days I will come to see (meet) you, and if it pleases G-d it will be concluded well.

From the truly insignificant,

Dovber, son of our teacher the rabbi, Rabbi Avraham.

(P.S.) I will tell the truth and not be ashamed because I saw a good sign in your student, the rabbi, (Moharan) our teacher the rabbi, Nachman n’y of Horodenka, who delivered the (previous) letter. (I see that) he is righteous and holy, and how much more so must be his teacher.
Even the student (R. Nachman of Horodenka) breathed into me a spirit of life. I, therefore, anticipate all good, sela, amen.

From, the abovementioned, Dovber.

..................................................................................................................................................................

DOCUMENT 71:

Letter from Baal Shem Tov in response to the previous letter:




B”H
Wednesday (Parshat) Devarim. Medzebuzh. 5512 (1752).

To the holy and honourable, the genius and holy rabbi, a man of G-d, the famous Chassid (who is) expert at (the) revealed and hidden (traditions) etc, our teacher rabbi, Rabbi Dovber, son of the holy rabbi, Mr Avraham, may you live:

I have received the writings of your holy hand. Reading between the lines it is clear that you have decided in your holy mind, to come to me.

Even though I can see clearly that you have been an opponent to our ways up to this time[7], nevertheless, I hope that if you do come (to me), then G-d willing, you will taste of the Tree of Knowledge and live forever.[8]

Know, honourable and holy one y’n, that matters that relate to the highest aspects of the universe, rest between us. So therefore hurry and come and remain permanently (with me).
From the one who loves you and requests your welfare at all times and seasons;

Yisrael, son of our teacher the rabbi, Rabbi Eliezer Baal Shem, from Medzebuzh.

..................................................................................................................................................................

UNNUMBERED DOCUMENT:

Response from R. Dovber of Mezeritch telling the Baal Shem Tov he will be delayed in arriving due to illness:


(Undated:)

To the honourable and holy rabbi, Master of all the children of the Exile, Mr Yisrael, who is known as (the) Baal Shem Tov, may you live:

While on the way (to you) I received your (previous) holy letter.

However, due to circumstances of my ill health, I shall remain here in the holy community (unnamed). And G-d willing, after the holy Shabbat, I will come to meet your holy countenance y’n, with joy and with trembling.

And my heart tells me that I was mistaken up till now (by not accepting you) – and may G-d forgive (me).

From the one who, from (my) heart, soul and desires, requests your well-being,

Dovber, son of our teacher and rabbi, Rabbi Avraham.

..................................................................................................................................................................

DOCUMENT 260:

Letter from the Baal Shem Tov to R. Dovber of Mezeritch telling him he will be away for  some time and handing over the position of leadership of the Movement to him for the duration of his absence:


B”H
Monday (Parshat) Noach. Ladmir. 5515 (1755).

To my student, the holy genius, an officer of the Torah, whose (very) name is holy, Mr Dovber n’y:
G-d spoke once and I heard twice[9]. A voice called out and opened the way (for me to go) to go out and come to Lvov for a period of two months.

Consequently, I (temporarily) place the (leadership) position (of the Chassidic Movement) on your holy shoulders, may you live, to conduct it according to your holy will. Your energy is (like) my energy, and your hand is (like) my hand. And those whom you bless will be blessed by G-d. Amen so may it be (His) will.

From your teacher who is giving of his glory to you,

Yisrael, son of our teacher and rabbi, Rabbi Eliezer Baal Shem from Medzebuzh.

..................................................................................................................................................................

DOCUMENT 8:

Letter from the Baal Shem Tov to R. Dovber of Mezeritch warning him not to take sides or interfere in the Emden/Eybeschutz controversy (where, amongst other accusations, R. Yaakov Enden accused R. Yehonatan Eybeschutz of being a secret follower of the false messiah Shabbatai Tzvi and of having Sabbatean amulets).[10]


B”H
Everv Shabbat. 3 Menachem Av 5515 (1755).

To my student the rabbi and holy genius, an officer of the Torah, a man of G-d etc., our teacher the rabbi, Rabbi Berenish[11], may you live:

Since I have (already) heard that you are sticking your head into the controversy between these two geniuses and pillars of the earth, namely: the holy Gaon Mr. Yaakov (Emden), son of the holy Gaon Mr Tzvi[12] n‎‎’y, and the holy Gaon Mr. Yehonatan (Eybeschutz) n’y.

I warn you now not to interfere in a controversy that is not yours. (This is because of) a hidden reason. And only let your eyes look at (be concerned with) your teacher. Enough said.

From your rabbi and teacher who always requests your well-being;

Yisrael, son of our teacher the rabbi, Rabbi Eliezer Baal Shem from Medzebuzh.

(P.S.) I have also written (a similar letter with a similar warning) to the holy Gaon Mr...(yud “ yud...missing text...)[13] n’y.

..................................................................................................................................................................

DOCUMENT 208:

Letter from the Baal Shem Tov to R. Dovber of Mezeritch informing him of certain Kavanot or mystical intentions:

Erev Shabbat Kodesh (Friday) of Selichot 5515. Medzebuzh.

To my exemplary student, the brilliant rabbi, officer of the Torah, (and) man of G-d etc., our teacher and rabbi, Rabbi Dovber n’y:

After inquiring after your health, mem[14]. I received the letter from your holy hand and I want to advise you, my son, that whenever you want to purify yourself in a mikveh[15], wash your hands and forehead in water and concentrate on the Kavanot (mystical intentions) of the mikveh, which I have taught you when you were still in my home.

I also want to add that on the two days of the holy Rosh haShanah, may it dawn on us for good, (just) before the sounding of the Shofar, imagine my presence before you, and also the presence of my well known teacher, who you (also) merited to see on one occasion.[16] 

(If you do this) then will you go on your holy path with confidence and without any (spiritual) accusations, or bad occurrences Heaven forefend.

If you only understand and know this you will be successful when you (will travel) to a village without a (Jewish) community for the High Holy Days, for this (journey) is Providence from Heaven.

I will (also) send my two students, namely:
The holy rabbi, the faithful of my house, Moharan[17] of Horodenka n’y, who will act as the prayer leader because of his pleasant voice and (because of his ability to) pierce the heavens (with his prayer).
And secondly (I will also send) the holy and pure rabbi etc., my student, our teacher the rabbi Kehot of Veritsh n’y, who will act as Baal Tokea[18], and he will also explain....(missing text)....to you through...

And may G-d grant that you are written and sealed for good, and may our prayers ascend on high (this) Rosh haShana. Amen, so may it be His will.

From your rabbi who always requests your well-being, (who is) waiting to see you (again) soon.
With much life and peace;

Yisrael, son of our teacher the rabbi, Rabbi Eliezer Baal Shem.

..................................................................................................................................................................





[1] lit.: to ‘shelter under my shade’.
[2] As a sign of respect the letters are written in the third person.
[3] Y’n is an abbreviation for yair nishmato which means ‘may your (his) soul shine’.
[4] Possibly a play on the name Israel Baal Shem Tov.
[5] Y’cn is an abbreviation for yechi nafsho which means ‘may his soul live’.
[6] Yz’v is an abbreviation for yishmereiho Tzuro veyichyu which means ‘may the Creator protect him and may he live’.
[7] Le’e is an abbreviation for le’eit atah which means ‘up to this time’.
[8] This is an unusual usage of the phrase Tree of Knowledge, which, according to the Genesis narrative, brought (good and) evil. It was the Tree of Life which gave eternal life. Perhaps the inference may be that after tasting the Chassidic Tree of Knowledge, the recipient would ‘live forever’. It may, on the other hand, simply be a mistake of the copyist.
[9] An expression suggesting that the Baal Shem Tov was able to interpret subtleties and inferences of Divine inspiration and act on them.
[10] See Document 192 and 194.
[11] Term of endearment for Dovber.
[12] Also known as the Chacham Tzvi. An an aside, according to R. Yitzchak Zilberstein (Tuvcha Yabiu p. 152) R. Eybeschutz appeared to one of his students in a dream, informing him that both he and R. Emden were sitting together in Gan Eden - while all those who fanned the controversy were stuck in Gehinnom. (I thank Rabbi Chaim Finkelstein for this contribution.)
[13] These are the markings as they appear in the original letter, but it is impossible to read the name in the original as it is illegible due to age.
[14] I do not know what this mem means.
[15] My assumption is that this would apply where no mikveh is available. (See the latter part of the letter where it is clear that the Maggid is about to travel to a village for the High Holidays.)
[16] This reference to the Baal Shem Tov’s unnamed teacher is also found in document 170, where he asks his wife to hide the teachings from the unnamed rav hayedua (the well-known rabbi). In this letter the reference is to his mori hayedua (his well- known teacher).
[17] Moharan is an abbreviation for Moreinu haRav Nachman (of Horodenka, the paternal grandfather of R. Nachman of Breslov.)
[18] The Shofar blower.